This section of the document will present how the work has been done in the project separated in the different phases described in our project plan.
In each section there will be a short comparison between deliverables planned and completed as well as a short description of the completed deliverable.
There will also be a short description of how we planned the time distribution.

\subsection{Definition}
During this phase, which was quite short, the group completed the project mission to be used by another group as their project.
Not surprisingly this all went according to the project plan, which was only written during the next phase thus had the actual facts of this phase already written in.
We did however run into a bit of problems when handing in the project mission since it first was sent to the wrong mail and then only one of the project members had the document on their personal workspace. This led the group to set up a version handling system where all future documents would be stored.

\subsection{Planning}
Here the group had planned to focus on writing the project plan.
This was also achieved during this period. However the project plan was supposed to be updated during the whole project to reflect how we thought the process would continue based on results so far.
The project plan was only updated twice during the whole project. The first time was after getting the supervisors comment about the document and a second time when the group received a new member.
When writing this document we split it up into different parts in different latex documents and worked in parallel with writing in each of them and then compiling the complete document by importing the separate documents. This is a work process that worked well for us when working in such a large group as we were, 6 people, and all following documents were done in the same manner.
The time effort estimisations done in the project plan was based on the amount of time allocated to the project as a whole then split up by grade procentages and the length of each phase.

\subsection{First iteration}
Now the work with writing the first version of the requirements document.
The plan was to focus on defining requirements and prioritizing. And the first version was supposed to be a simple draft of the finished document. This is not how the group chose to percieve the first iteration, instead the group started working in all fields at once and tried to make as a complete requirements document as possible before the first review of the supervisor. This led to the group spending a lot of time and energy on the first version. The eagerness of the group to do as much as possible meant that the workload felt overwhelmin for many in the group. 

\subsection{Second iteration}
During this phase the group, as planned, did not do much elicitation, at least not compared to during the first iteration.
Instead focus was shifted to specifying the already elicited requirements and a consistency priorization was done by the customer. Due to the fact that our group had not limited our domain enough we had a lot of requirements, more than a hundred and this in turn led us to extend the deadline of finishing requirements document 2. That meant that this phase was a bit longer then planned. In this phase the group had its second responsibility as product owners to the group working with our project mission when writing a Requirements review(rr). This also took phase very late in the phase, 2 days before deadline of review report since we didn't receive the other group's requirements document and checklist until very late.
All in all we had very little contact with the group we were acting as customers for.
Except for the delays this phase went according to our project plan.

\subsection{Finalization}
When we arrived at this phase most of the group members had lost faith in the project and were under alot of stress from other courses not to mention the workload we had undertaken in this course.
We did the final work on requirements document mostly taking into consideration the review report and the feedback from our supervisor.
Two members from the group also held a conference presentation.
Most of the work during this phase was not done in a ``bull pen'' environment as it had been done in previous phases, the different schedules of the group members made this impossible and most of the work to be done was split up into parts to be done by each member. This was also true when writing this report.
This phase was still in progress when writing this report so the final result is not clear yet.

